Shop

Kursi Gresco 809 H Jakarta

Original price was: Rp4,000,000.Current price is: Rp3,200,000.

Kursi Gresco 809 HA Jakarta

Original price was: Rp4,000,000.Current price is: Rp3,200,000.

Kursi Gresco 809 HW Jakarta

Original price was: Rp4,000,000.Current price is: Rp3,200,000.

Kursi Gresco 809 M Jakarta

Original price was: Rp4,000,000.Current price is: Rp3,200,000.

Kursi Gresco 809 MA Jakarta

Original price was: Rp4,000,000.Current price is: Rp3,200,000.

Kursi Gresco 809 MW Jakarta

Original price was: Rp4,000,000.Current price is: Rp3,200,000.

Kursi Gresco 810 H Jakarta

Original price was: Rp4,000,000.Current price is: Rp3,200,000.

Kursi Gresco 810 HA Jakarta

Original price was: Rp4,000,000.Current price is: Rp3,200,000.

Kursi Gresco 810 HW Jakarta

Original price was: Rp4,000,000.Current price is: Rp3,200,000.

Kursi Gresco 810 M Jakarta

Original price was: Rp4,000,000.Current price is: Rp3,200,000.

Kursi Gresco GC 200 H Jakarta

Original price was: Rp4,000,000.Current price is: Rp3,200,000.

Kursi Gresco GC 200 HA Jakarta

Original price was: Rp4,400,000.Current price is: Rp3,520,000.

Kursi Gresco GC 200 M Jakarta

Original price was: Rp3,800,000.Current price is: Rp3,040,000.

Kursi Gresco GC 200 MA Jakarta

Original price was: Rp4,200,000.Current price is: Rp3,360,000.

Kursi Gresco GC 201 H Jakarta

Original price was: Rp2,350,000.Current price is: Rp1,880,000.

Kursi Gresco GC 201 HA Jakarta

Original price was: Rp2,750,000.Current price is: Rp2,200,000.

Kursi Gresco GC 201 M Jakarta

Original price was: Rp2,250,000.Current price is: Rp1,800,000.

Kursi Gresco GC 201 MA Jakarta

Original price was: Rp2,650,000.Current price is: Rp2,120,000.

Kursi Gresco GC 201 U Jakarta

Original price was: Rp2,250,000.Current price is: Rp1,800,000.

Kursi Gresco GC 202 H Jakarta

Original price was: Rp2,100,000.Current price is: Rp1,680,000.

Online store of household appliances and electronics

Then the question arises: where’s the content? Not there yet? That’s not so bad, there’s dummy copy to the rescue. But worse, what if the fish doesn’t fit in the can, the foot’s to big for the boot? Or to small? To short sentences, to many headings, images too large for the proposed design, or too small, or they fit in but it looks iffy for reasons.

A client that’s unhappy for a reason is a problem, a client that’s unhappy though he or her can’t quite put a finger on it is worse. Chances are there wasn’t collaboration, communication, and checkpoints, there wasn’t a process agreed upon or specified with the granularity required. It’s content strategy gone awry right from the start. If that’s what you think how bout the other way around? How can you evaluate content without design? No typography, no colors, no layout, no styles, all those things that convey the important signals that go beyond the mere textual, hierarchies of information, weight, emphasis, oblique stresses, priorities, all those subtle cues that also have visual and emotional appeal to the reader.